2002 Chrysler 300 vs. 1992 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2002 Chrysler 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler 300 (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1992 Ford Falcon. (198 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 133 kg more than 1992 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (348 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler 300. (346 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler 300.

Compare all specifications: