2002 Chrysler 300 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler 300 (251 HP) has 184 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler 300 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |