2002 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler 300. (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 417 kg more than 2002 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Lexus RX | |
Make | Chrysler | Lexus |
Model | 300 | RX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1633 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 73 L |