2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1954 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Concorde | 300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2390 mm |
