2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1959 Ford Fairlane. (168 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 473 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 5769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1621 kg | 2094 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3000 mm |