2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1965 Lotus 33

To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus 33. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus 33 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1965 Lotus 33. (212 HP @ 10800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus 33. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 1162 kg more than 1965 Lotus 33. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Lotus 33 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus 33. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1965 Lotus 33 has manual transmission. 1965 Lotus 33 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: