2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1968 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,517 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (252 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 629 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (339 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300. 2002 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1968 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1968 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: