2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 376 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Concorde | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1621 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |