2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 541 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Concorde | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3517 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1613 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 107 L |