2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1982 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 493 kg more than 1982 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1982 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1982 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1982 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1982 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Chrysler | Simca |
Model | Concorde | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |