2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 851 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Concorde | 102 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1621 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2160 mm |
