2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,517 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (252 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1988 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Ranger.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3517 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1750 mm |