2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (190 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Concorde | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Concorde | SS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
