2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Mountaineer. (207 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Mountaineer.

Because 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercury Mountaineer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (340 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Mountaineer. (254 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Mountaineer.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chrysler Concorde 2009 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Chrysler Mercury
Model Concorde Mountaineer
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3516 cc 4009 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 251 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 340 Nm 254 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 5100 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.9:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1880 mm