2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2010 Holden UTE

To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 167 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Concorde.

Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. 2002 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: