2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2011 Renault Megane
To start off, 2011 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2011 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 406 kg more than 2011 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Megane. (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Concorde | 2011 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Concorde | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1621 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |