2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Crossfire | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 3195 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2850 mm |
