2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1978 Dodge Omni
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 390 kg more than 1978 Dodge Omni.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 1978 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Crossfire | Omni |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 49 L |