2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1998 Proton Satria
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Proton Satria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Proton Satria would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Proton Satria. (161 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Proton Satria.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 1998 Proton Satria | |
| Make | Chrysler | Proton |
| Model | Crossfire | Satria |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3195 cc | 1833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
