2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2002 Chrysler Crossfire has manual transmission. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Crossfire | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3195 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
