2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 532 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. (340 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Crossfire | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 85 L |