2002 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 56 kg more than 2008 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Omega. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Crossfire | 2008 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | Crossfire | Omega |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |