2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat

To start off, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 710 kg more than 1974 Lotus Eclat.

Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Lotus Eclat. (190 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Lotus Eclat.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1974 Lotus Eclat
Make Chrysler Lotus
Model Grand Voyager Eclat
Year Released 2002 1974
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2427 cc 1971 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 95.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 69.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1765 kg 1055 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 67 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]