2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1979 TVR 3000
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 745 kg more than 1979 TVR 3000.
Because 1979 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1979 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | Grand Voyager | 3000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 58 L |