2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1980 Lada S
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada S would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 765 kg more than 1980 Lada S.
Because 1980 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1980 Lada S | |
Make | Chrysler | Lada |
Model | Grand Voyager | S |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 43 L |