2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 75 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Grand Voyager | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3010 mm |