2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Voyager | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |