2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2007 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2007 Toyota Matrix is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2007 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 410 kg more than 2007 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2007 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Grand Voyager | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |