2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. 2009 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Grand Voyager | Avenger |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 2358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |