2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Kia Optima
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Kia Optima | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | Grand Voyager | Optima |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 229 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 62 L |