2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Tata Indica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2009 Tata Indica. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 760 kg more than 2009 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Indica. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Indica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2427 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1005 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 37 L |
