2002 Chrysler LHS vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler LHS (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler LHS (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler LHS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler LHS | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | LHS | 5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 60 L |