2002 Chrysler LHS vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler LHS. (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler LHS.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chrysler LHS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler LHS. (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler LHS | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | LHS | MKS |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 72 L |