2002 Chrysler LHS vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler LHS (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler LHS weights approximately 75 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler LHS (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler LHS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2002 Chrysler LHS has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler LHS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler LHS | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | LHS | 3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 55 L |