2002 Chrysler Neon vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Neon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 62 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (154 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Neon. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2002 Chrysler Neon has manual transmission. 2002 Chrysler Neon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Neon | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Equator |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3260 mm |
