2002 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 2012 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Holden Barina | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Neon | Barina |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 154 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |