2002 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |