2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 198 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Chrysler | Talbot |
| Model | Sebring | Baby |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |
