2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1954 Talbot T 26. (198 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot T 26.
Because 1954 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1954 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1954 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Chrysler | Talbot |
Model | Sebring | T 26 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |