2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1958 Seat 600

To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 876 kg more than 1958 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1958 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: