2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 257 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Sebring | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |