2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 300 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | 929 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |