2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Donkervoort |
| Model | Sebring | S7 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1080 mm |
