2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | Synergy 2010 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
