2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sebring | FTO |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
