2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile LSS would be higher. At 3,784 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile LSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS (202 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS weights approximately 136 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS (312 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (226 Nm). This means 1999 Oldsmobile LSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1999 Oldsmobile LSS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Sebring | LSS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 3784 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1588 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2780 mm |
