2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 675 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (226 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | E-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |