2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 287 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | F-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 95 L |