2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sebring | 100 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 8998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 2640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |
