2002 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Voyager (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1942 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Voyager | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Voyager | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1942 |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3260 mm |